Block grafting in the aesthetic zone with maxgraft®, Jason® membrane and cerabone® - Dres. H. Maghaireh and V. Ivancheva
-
1/35 - Initial situation – Treatment plan: Replace the adhesive upper left central incisor bridge with a dental implantBlock grafting in the aesthetic zone with maxgraft®, Jason® membrane and cerabone® - Dres. H. Maghaireh and V. Ivancheva
-
2/35 - Advanced bone loss after traumatic tooth loss more than 10 years agoBlock grafting in the aesthetic zone with maxgraft®, Jason® membrane and cerabone® - Dres. H. Maghaireh and V. Ivancheva
-
3/35 - CBCT: Advanced bone loss after traumatic tooth loss more than 10 years agoBlock grafting in the aesthetic zone with maxgraft®, Jason® membrane and cerabone® - Dres. H. Maghaireh and V. Ivancheva
-
4/35 - Patient used to have a diastema in the area which she no longer wanted to be recreated. Treatment plan: implant for UL1 and a veneer for the UR1 to match the space analysis and achieve acceptable and symmetrical aesthetic outcomeBlock grafting in the aesthetic zone with maxgraft®, Jason® membrane and cerabone® - Dres. H. Maghaireh and V. Ivancheva
-
5/35 - Three-sided full thickness flap and cleaning the surgical area from the granulation tissueBlock grafting in the aesthetic zone with maxgraft®, Jason® membrane and cerabone® - Dres. H. Maghaireh and V. Ivancheva
-
6/35 - Three-sided full thickness flap and cleaning the surgical area from the granulation tissueBlock grafting in the aesthetic zone with maxgraft®, Jason® membrane and cerabone® - Dres. H. Maghaireh and V. Ivancheva
-
7/35 - Shaping and preparing the uni-cortical maxgraft® block using straight hand-piece under copious irrigation to fit the surgical field and to ensure good adaptationBlock grafting in the aesthetic zone with maxgraft®, Jason® membrane and cerabone® - Dres. H. Maghaireh and V. Ivancheva
-
8/35 - Shaping and preparing the uni-cortical maxgraft® block using straight hand-piece under copious irrigation to fit the surgical field and to ensure good adaptationBlock grafting in the aesthetic zone with maxgraft®, Jason® membrane and cerabone® - Dres. H. Maghaireh and V. Ivancheva
-
9/35 - Stabilisation of the bone block with two 10 mm fixation screws placed oblique. Sharp edges of the block were polished to avoid defeasance in the soft tissue healingBlock grafting in the aesthetic zone with maxgraft®, Jason® membrane and cerabone® - Dres. H. Maghaireh and V. Ivancheva
-
10/35 - Stabilisation of the bone block with two 10 mm fixation screws placed oblique. Sharp edges of the block were polished to avoid defeasance in the soft tissue healingBlock grafting in the aesthetic zone with maxgraft®, Jason® membrane and cerabone® - Dres. H. Maghaireh and V. Ivancheva
-
11/35 - Layer of maxgraft® cancellous particles used to fill any gaps and to allow smooth contour medially and distally and covering with Jason® membraneBlock grafting in the aesthetic zone with maxgraft®, Jason® membrane and cerabone® - Dres. H. Maghaireh and V. Ivancheva
-
12/35 - Layer of maxgraft® cancellous particles used to fill any gaps and to allow smooth contour medially and distally and covering with Jason® membraneBlock grafting in the aesthetic zone with maxgraft®, Jason® membrane and cerabone® - Dres. H. Maghaireh and V. Ivancheva
-
13/35 - Soft tissue adjustment - frenulum adjustment and muco-periosteal release to achieve full closure under no tension to allow the flap margins to heal with primary intensionBlock grafting in the aesthetic zone with maxgraft®, Jason® membrane and cerabone® - Dres. H. Maghaireh and V. Ivancheva
-
14/35 - Soft tissue adjustment - frenulum adjustment and muco-periosteal release to achieve full closure under no tension to allow the flap margins to heal with primary intensionBlock grafting in the aesthetic zone with maxgraft®, Jason® membrane and cerabone® - Dres. H. Maghaireh and V. Ivancheva
-
15/35 - Flap closure using 5/0 monofilaments Prolene suturesBlock grafting in the aesthetic zone with maxgraft®, Jason® membrane and cerabone® - Dres. H. Maghaireh and V. Ivancheva
-
16/35 - Flap closure using 5/0 monofilaments Prolene suturesBlock grafting in the aesthetic zone with maxgraft®, Jason® membrane and cerabone® - Dres. H. Maghaireh and V. Ivancheva
-
17/35 - Six months healing period was allowed - healthy soft tissue contour, satisfactory convexityBlock grafting in the aesthetic zone with maxgraft®, Jason® membrane and cerabone® - Dres. H. Maghaireh and V. Ivancheva
-
18/35 - Six months healing period was allowed - healthy soft tissue contour, satisfactory convexityBlock grafting in the aesthetic zone with maxgraft®, Jason® membrane and cerabone® - Dres. H. Maghaireh and V. Ivancheva
-
19/35 - Post op CBCT shows well integrated and remodelled bone block with sufficient augmentationBlock grafting in the aesthetic zone with maxgraft®, Jason® membrane and cerabone® - Dres. H. Maghaireh and V. Ivancheva
-
20/35 - Post op CBCT shows well integrated and remodelled bone block with sufficient augmentationBlock grafting in the aesthetic zone with maxgraft®, Jason® membrane and cerabone® - Dres. H. Maghaireh and V. Ivancheva
-
21/35 - Osteotomy prepared revealing a well integrated and nourished bone block. Prostheticly driven implant placement (Straumann Roxolid BLT - RC 4.1x 10 mm) - using a pre-fabricated surgical guide of the approved wax upBlock grafting in the aesthetic zone with maxgraft®, Jason® membrane and cerabone® - Dres. H. Maghaireh and V. Ivancheva
-
22/35 - Osteotomy prepared revealing a well integrated and nourished bone blockBlock grafting in the aesthetic zone with maxgraft®, Jason® membrane and cerabone® - Dres. H. Maghaireh and V. Ivancheva
-
23/35 - Implant is placed 3 mm away from the cementoenamel junction. Good primary stability was achieved with a torque of 35 Nom at placement and good block integrationBlock grafting in the aesthetic zone with maxgraft®, Jason® membrane and cerabone® - Dres. H. Maghaireh and V. Ivancheva
-
24/35 - 4.5 mm diameter x 4 mm height healing abutmentBlock grafting in the aesthetic zone with maxgraft®, Jason® membrane and cerabone® - Dres. H. Maghaireh and V. Ivancheva
-
25/35 - GBR at the time of the implant placement - added cerabone® 0.5 cc small particles to increase the convexity and insure stability of the soft tissue. Jason® membrane stabilised with titanium pins and sutured palatallyBlock grafting in the aesthetic zone with maxgraft®, Jason® membrane and cerabone® - Dres. H. Maghaireh and V. Ivancheva
-
26/35 - GBR at the time of the implant placement - added cerabone® 0.5 cc small particles to increase the convexity and insure stability of the soft tissue. Jason® membrane stabilised with titanium pins and sutured palatallyBlock grafting in the aesthetic zone with maxgraft®, Jason® membrane and cerabone® - Dres. H. Maghaireh and V. Ivancheva
-
27/35 - Exposure of the UL1 implant and fitting a chair side temporary crownBlock grafting in the aesthetic zone with maxgraft®, Jason® membrane and cerabone® - Dres. H. Maghaireh and V. Ivancheva
-
28/35 - Exposure of the UL1 implant and fitting a chair side temporary crownBlock grafting in the aesthetic zone with maxgraft®, Jason® membrane and cerabone® - Dres. H. Maghaireh and V. Ivancheva
-
29/35 - Final implant impression with Straumann RC customised impression pick up with an open tray for final screw retained implant crown on UL1 and Porcelain veneer on UR1Block grafting in the aesthetic zone with maxgraft®, Jason® membrane and cerabone® - Dres. H. Maghaireh and V. Ivancheva
-
30/35 - Final implant impression with Straumann RC customised impression pick up with an open tray for final screw retained implant crown on UL1 and Porcelain veneer on UR1Block grafting in the aesthetic zone with maxgraft®, Jason® membrane and cerabone® - Dres. H. Maghaireh and V. Ivancheva
-
31/35 - Final fit of final screw retained implant crown with CAD/CAM Ti abutment on UL1 and Porcelain veneer on UR1. Lab work was provided by Ceramist Guglielmo Parziale - Napoli - ItalyBlock grafting in the aesthetic zone with maxgraft®, Jason® membrane and cerabone® - Dres. H. Maghaireh and V. Ivancheva
-
32/35 - 5 years clinical review – stable outcomeBlock grafting in the aesthetic zone with maxgraft®, Jason® membrane and cerabone® - Dres. H. Maghaireh and V. Ivancheva
-
33/35 - 5 y post op CBCT - Axial view at the coronal 2mm levelBlock grafting in the aesthetic zone with maxgraft®, Jason® membrane and cerabone® - Dres. H. Maghaireh and V. Ivancheva
-
34/35 - 5 y post op CBCT - Coronal view showing the upper left central incisor implantBlock grafting in the aesthetic zone with maxgraft®, Jason® membrane and cerabone® - Dres. H. Maghaireh and V. Ivancheva
-
35/35 - 5 y post OP CBCT -Sagittal viewBlock grafting in the aesthetic zone with maxgraft®, Jason® membrane and cerabone® - Dres. H. Maghaireh and V. Ivancheva

Baseline clinical situation.

Situation before extraction of the teeth

Initial clinical situation

Initial situation after extraction of tooth 21 after 6 months

Preparation of a single tooth defect with severely resorbed vestibular wall

Initial clinical situation.

Initial clinical situation

Tooth 16 furcation involvement with gingival marginal recession and large Class 5 filling

Initial x-ray, ten years post implantationem alio loco, large peri-implant bone loss

Extraction socket with bone wall defect

Situation before tooth extraction

Initial clinical situation

Initial X-ray presenting a very deep intrabony defect of tooth 21

Implant placed in the deficient site. permamem® in place for covering.

Initial situation – Treatment plan: Replace the adhesive upper left central incisor bridge with a dental implant

Occlusal view of attached maxgraft® cortico at the buccal site

Initial x-ray, tooth 25 compromised and to be extracted

Clinical situation at baseline: Situation after tooth extraction UR1 due to a failed endodontic treatment 3 months previously

Alveolar socket before soft and hard tissue augmentation

Pre-operative situation; tooth 21 proved not to be worth preserving

Initial clinical situation: 9 mm pocket depth associated with root fracture

Initial situation - A young female 34 years old lost her front teeth in an surfing accident and she had a 5 unit bridge supported by her upper left lateral and right canine. The restoration failed and both supporting crowns have exposed and leaking margins.

Initial situation - endodontically failing tooth 22, very thin biotype, high lip line and esthetic expectations

Preoperative x-ray, severe bone atrophy

Initial situation - broken and missing upper right central incisor (UR1). This tooth was removed long time ago and there were signs of bone loss and resorption due to the bone remodelling. Patient was also undergoing orthodontic treatment due to the loss of mesio-distal space.