Ridge splitting and gingival contour augmentation with mucoderm® - Dr. F. Rathe
-
1/8 - Initial clinical situation with narrow ridgeRidge splitting and gingival contour augmentation with mucoderm® - Dr. F. Rathe
-
2/8 - Ridge splittingRidge splitting and gingival contour augmentation with mucoderm® - Dr. F. Rathe
-
3/8 - Implant placementRidge splitting and gingival contour augmentation with mucoderm® - Dr. F. Rathe
-
4/8 - Rehydration of mucoderm®Ridge splitting and gingival contour augmentation with mucoderm® - Dr. F. Rathe
-
5/8 - Hard tissue augmentation followed by soft tissue thickening with mucoderm®Ridge splitting and gingival contour augmentation with mucoderm® - Dr. F. Rathe
-
6/8 - Tension-free wound closureRidge splitting and gingival contour augmentation with mucoderm® - Dr. F. Rathe
-
7/8 - Post-operative healing at 3 monthsRidge splitting and gingival contour augmentation with mucoderm® - Dr. F. Rathe
-
8/8 - Clinical outcome 2.5 years post-opRidge splitting and gingival contour augmentation with mucoderm® - Dr. F. Rathe
X-ray of initial clinical situation
Initial clinical situation showing severe soft tissue loss
Initial clinical situation
Full-thickness flap preparation bucally and lingually
Initial clinical situation
Initial clinical situation
Initial clinical situation
Initial clinical situation showing tooth 45 not worth preserving
Drilling template for guided implant placement
recession on tooth 11
Initial clinical situation
X-ray shows a 3-dimensional periondontal defect
Bone defect in area 11-21 due to two lost implants (periimplantitis) after 15 years of function
Probing demonstrates peri-implant pocket depth of 8 mm







