Horizontal GBR using permamem®, cerabone® and maxgraft® granules and soft tissue augmentation with mucoderm® - Dres. H. Maghaireh and V. Ivancheva
-
01/33 - Initial situation - A young female 34 years old lost her front teeth in an surfing accident and she had a 5 unit bridge supported by her upper left lateral and right canine. The restoration failed and both supporting crowns have exposed and leaking margins.Horizontal GBR using permamem®, cerabone® and maxgraft® granules and soft tissue augmentation with mucoderm® - Dres. H. Maghaireh and V. Ivancheva
-
02/33 - Initial situation - A young female 34 years old lost her front teeth in an surfing accident and she had a 5 unit bridge supported by her upper left lateral and right canine. The restoration failed and both supporting crowns have exposed and leaking margins.Horizontal GBR using permamem®, cerabone® and maxgraft® granules and soft tissue augmentation with mucoderm® - Dres. H. Maghaireh and V. Ivancheva
-
03/33 - Elevating the surgical flap and cleaning the surgical area from the granulation tissueHorizontal GBR using permamem®, cerabone® and maxgraft® granules and soft tissue augmentation with mucoderm® - Dres. H. Maghaireh and V. Ivancheva
-
04/33 - Cortectomy was performed with high speed round burrHorizontal GBR using permamem®, cerabone® and maxgraft® granules and soft tissue augmentation with mucoderm® - Dres. H. Maghaireh and V. Ivancheva
-
05/33 - Shaping and preparing of permamem®.Horizontal GBR using permamem®, cerabone® and maxgraft® granules and soft tissue augmentation with mucoderm® - Dres. H. Maghaireh and V. Ivancheva
-
06/33 - Membrane adaptation with fixation screws on the buccal sideHorizontal GBR using permamem®, cerabone® and maxgraft® granules and soft tissue augmentation with mucoderm® - Dres. H. Maghaireh and V. Ivancheva
-
07/33 - Horizontal bone regeneration using layering technique with initial layer of maxgraft® particles mixed with cerabone® (0.5- 1.0 mm)Horizontal GBR using permamem®, cerabone® and maxgraft® granules and soft tissue augmentation with mucoderm® - Dres. H. Maghaireh and V. Ivancheva
-
08/33 - Horizontal bone regeneration using layering technique with initial layer of maxgraft® particles mixed with cerabone® (0.5- 1.0 mm)Horizontal GBR using permamem®, cerabone® and maxgraft® granules and soft tissue augmentation with mucoderm® - Dres. H. Maghaireh and V. Ivancheva
-
09/33 - Second layer of cerabone® (0.5- 1.0) of 0.5 cc to create convexityHorizontal GBR using permamem®, cerabone® and maxgraft® granules and soft tissue augmentation with mucoderm® - Dres. H. Maghaireh and V. Ivancheva
-
10/33 - Second layer of cerabone® (0.5- 1.0) of 0.5 cc to create convexityHorizontal GBR using permamem®, cerabone® and maxgraft® granules and soft tissue augmentation with mucoderm® - Dres. H. Maghaireh and V. Ivancheva
-
11/33 - Stabilizing the membrane palatal with 4/0 proline sutures.Horizontal GBR using permamem®, cerabone® and maxgraft® granules and soft tissue augmentation with mucoderm® - Dres. H. Maghaireh and V. Ivancheva
-
12/33 - Stabilizing the membrane palatal with 4/0 proline suturesHorizontal GBR using permamem®, cerabone® and maxgraft® granules and soft tissue augmentation with mucoderm® - Dres. H. Maghaireh and V. Ivancheva
-
13/33 - Final sutures closed under no tension and fixing and adjusting the temporary bridgeHorizontal GBR using permamem®, cerabone® and maxgraft® granules and soft tissue augmentation with mucoderm® - Dres. H. Maghaireh and V. Ivancheva
-
14/33 - Final sutures closed under no tension and fixing and adjusting the temporary bridgeHorizontal GBR using permamem®, cerabone® and maxgraft® granules and soft tissue augmentation with mucoderm® - Dres. H. Maghaireh and V. Ivancheva
-
15/33 - Initial situation - 24 w after initial horizontal GBR. permamem® is intact and kept the graft in stabile position. Acceptable ridge countering has been achieved and membrane has been removedHorizontal GBR using permamem®, cerabone® and maxgraft® granules and soft tissue augmentation with mucoderm® - Dres. H. Maghaireh and V. Ivancheva
-
16/33 - Initial situation - 24 w after initial horizontal GBR. permamem® is intact and kept the graft in stabile position. Acceptable ridge countering has been achieved and membrane has been removedHorizontal GBR using permamem®, cerabone® and maxgraft® granules and soft tissue augmentation with mucoderm® - Dres. H. Maghaireh and V. Ivancheva
-
17/33 - Stability and density of the bone graft particles after membrane removalHorizontal GBR using permamem®, cerabone® and maxgraft® granules and soft tissue augmentation with mucoderm® - Dres. H. Maghaireh and V. Ivancheva
-
18/33 - Stability and density of the bone graft particles after membrane removalHorizontal GBR using permamem®, cerabone® and maxgraft® granules and soft tissue augmentation with mucoderm® - Dres. H. Maghaireh and V. Ivancheva
-
19/33 - Implant placement in the correct 4D position following the prosthetically driven placement. For central incisions in the cingulum regionHorizontal GBR using permamem®, cerabone® and maxgraft® granules and soft tissue augmentation with mucoderm® - Dres. H. Maghaireh and V. Ivancheva
-
20/33 - Implant placement in the correct 4D position following the prosthetically driven placement. For central incisions in the cingulum regionHorizontal GBR using permamem®, cerabone® and maxgraft® granules and soft tissue augmentation with mucoderm® - Dres. H. Maghaireh and V. Ivancheva
-
21/33 - Guided bone regeneration after implant placement using cerabone® (0.5- 1.0 mm) shaped to create convexity and covered by two mucoderm® (15x20 mm) used as a soft tissue graft as well as a membrane over the cerabone®. mucoderm® was stabilised with stabilising sutures on each sideHorizontal GBR using permamem®, cerabone® and maxgraft® granules and soft tissue augmentation with mucoderm® - Dres. H. Maghaireh and V. Ivancheva
-
22/33 - Guided bone regeneration after implant placement using cerabone® (0.5- 1.0 mm) shaped to create convexity and covered by two mucoderm® (15x20 mm) used as a soft tissue graft as well as a membrane over the cerabone®. mucoderm® was stabilised with stabilising sutures on each sideHorizontal GBR using permamem®, cerabone® and maxgraft® granules and soft tissue augmentation with mucoderm® - Dres. H. Maghaireh and V. Ivancheva
-
23/33 - Closure sutures and fit of the temporary bridge - cemented on the adjacent peeped teethHorizontal GBR using permamem®, cerabone® and maxgraft® granules and soft tissue augmentation with mucoderm® - Dres. H. Maghaireh and V. Ivancheva
-
24/33 - Closure sutures and fit of the temporary bridge - cemented on the adjacent peeped teethHorizontal GBR using permamem®, cerabone® and maxgraft® granules and soft tissue augmentation with mucoderm® - Dres. H. Maghaireh and V. Ivancheva
-
25/33 - Preparation and fit of fixed screw retained temporary bridge and temporary crowns of the adjacent teeth for soft tissue contouring 18 weeks after implant placementHorizontal GBR using permamem®, cerabone® and maxgraft® granules and soft tissue augmentation with mucoderm® - Dres. H. Maghaireh and V. Ivancheva
-
26/33 - Impression and customising the impression pick ups and taking an implant impression for UR1 and UL1 implants with open tray technique 22 weeks after implant placementHorizontal GBR using permamem®, cerabone® and maxgraft® granules and soft tissue augmentation with mucoderm® - Dres. H. Maghaireh and V. Ivancheva
-
27/33 - Impression and customising the impression pick ups and taking an implant impression for UR1 and UL1 implants with open tray technique 22 weeks after implant placementHorizontal GBR using permamem®, cerabone® and maxgraft® granules and soft tissue augmentation with mucoderm® - Dres. H. Maghaireh and V. Ivancheva
-
28/33 - Final cement retained porcelain implant crowns on CAD/CAM Ti abutmentsHorizontal GBR using permamem®, cerabone® and maxgraft® granules and soft tissue augmentation with mucoderm® - Dres. H. Maghaireh and V. Ivancheva
-
29/33 - Final cement retained porcelain implant crowns on CAD/CAM Ti abutmentsHorizontal GBR using permamem®, cerabone® and maxgraft® granules and soft tissue augmentation with mucoderm® - Dres. H. Maghaireh and V. Ivancheva
-
30/33 - Final cement retained porcelain implant crowns on CAD/CAM Ti abutmentsHorizontal GBR using permamem®, cerabone® and maxgraft® granules and soft tissue augmentation with mucoderm® - Dres. H. Maghaireh and V. Ivancheva
-
31/33 - Final result 3 months after implant placement surgery and 2 weeks after final prosthetic integration , showing sufficient ridge contouring around the UR1 and UL1 dental implants and satisfactory peri-implant soft tissue thicknessHorizontal GBR using permamem®, cerabone® and maxgraft® granules and soft tissue augmentation with mucoderm® - Dres. H. Maghaireh and V. Ivancheva
-
32/33 - Final result 3 months after implant placement surgery and 2 weeks after final prosthetic integration , showing sufficient ridge contouring around the UR1 and UL1 dental implants and satisfactory peri-implant soft tissue thicknessHorizontal GBR using permamem®, cerabone® and maxgraft® granules and soft tissue augmentation with mucoderm® - Dres. H. Maghaireh and V. Ivancheva
-
33/33 - Smile line and harmonisation of white and pink aesthetic.Horizontal GBR using permamem®, cerabone® and maxgraft® granules and soft tissue augmentation with mucoderm® - Dres. H. Maghaireh and V. Ivancheva
Baseline clinical situation.
Situation before extraction of the teeth
Initial clinical situation
Initial situation after extraction of tooth 21 after 6 months
Preparation of a single tooth defect with severely resorbed vestibular wall
Initial clinical situation.
Initial clinical situation
Tooth 16 furcation involvement with gingival marginal recession and large Class 5 filling
Initial x-ray, ten years post implantationem alio loco, large peri-implant bone loss
Extraction socket with bone wall defect
Situation before tooth extraction
Initial clinical situation
Initial X-ray presenting a very deep intrabony defect of tooth 21
Implant placed in the deficient site. permamem® in place for covering.
Initial situation – Treatment plan: Replace the adhesive upper left central incisor bridge with a dental implant
Occlusal view of attached maxgraft® cortico at the buccal site
Initial x-ray, tooth 25 compromised and to be extracted
Clinical situation at baseline: Situation after tooth extraction UR1 due to a failed endodontic treatment 3 months previously
Alveolar socket before soft and hard tissue augmentation
Pre-operative situation; tooth 21 proved not to be worth preserving
Initial clinical situation: 9 mm pocket depth associated with root fracture
Initial situation - A young female 34 years old lost her front teeth in an surfing accident and she had a 5 unit bridge supported by her upper left lateral and right canine. The restoration failed and both supporting crowns have exposed and leaking margins.
Initial situation - endodontically failing tooth 22, very thin biotype, high lip line and esthetic expectations
Preoperative x-ray, severe bone atrophy
Initial situation - broken and missing upper right central incisor (UR1). This tooth was removed long time ago and there were signs of bone loss and resorption due to the bone remodelling. Patient was also undergoing orthodontic treatment due to the loss of mesio-distal space.
































