Succès clinique avec le bon concept de régénération

L’indication matrix vous aide à choisir le concept de traitement plus adapté par une requête intelligente dans le menu à gauche.
Plus vous décrivez votre situation clinique, plus la sélection des concepts de traitement à droite sera affinée.

L’indication matrix contient > 150 cas cliniques et vidéos. Vous trouverez aussi des conseils d’utilisation et recommandations d’experts internationallement renommés.

Expertise

Adresez-nous vos questions sur les concepts ou les produits et nos experts vous contacteront.
product-management@botiss.com

Partagez vos cas

Pour publier vos cas cliniques bien documentés ou vos vidéos d’intervention, écrivez à
product-management@botiss.com

Delayed implant placement with GBR and soft tissue augmentation at the aesthetic area  -  2 years follow up – Dr. H. Maghaireh & Dr. V. Ivancheva

Initial situation - broken and missing upper right central incisor (UR1). This tooth was removed long time ago and there were signs of bone loss and resorption due to the bone remodelling. Patient was also undergoing orthodontic treatment due to the loss of mesio-distal space.

, Delayed implant placement with GBR and soft tissue augmentation at the aesthetic area  -  2 years follow up – Dr. H. Maghaireh & Dr. V. Ivancheva

Guided bone regeneration after implant placement using Jason® membrane with good pin stabilisation.

, Delayed implant placement with GBR and soft tissue augmentation at the aesthetic area  -  2 years follow up – Dr. H. Maghaireh & Dr. V. Ivancheva

Exposed implant threads covered with a thin layer of autogenous bone chips harvested during implant bed preparation.

, Delayed implant placement with GBR and soft tissue augmentation at the aesthetic area  -  2 years follow up – Dr. H. Maghaireh & Dr. V. Ivancheva

Bone volume augmentation was conducted with maxgraft® (<2 mm mm of 0.5 cc) mixed with cerabone® (0.5- 1.0 mm) 4:1 shaped to create convexity.

, Delayed implant placement with GBR and soft tissue augmentation at the aesthetic area  -  2 years follow up – Dr. H. Maghaireh & Dr. V. Ivancheva

Stabilisation of Jason® membrane using additional titanium pins.

, Delayed implant placement with GBR and soft tissue augmentation at the aesthetic area  -  2 years follow up – Dr. H. Maghaireh & Dr. V. Ivancheva

Grafting site was covered by two mucoderm® (15x20mm) used as a soft tissue graft as well as a membrane over Jason® membrane . mucoderm® was stabilised with sutures on each side.

, Delayed implant placement with GBR and soft tissue augmentation at the aesthetic area  -  2 years follow up – Dr. H. Maghaireh & Dr. V. Ivancheva

Modified sling suture used to stabilise mucoderm® .

, Delayed implant placement with GBR and soft tissue augmentation at the aesthetic area  -  2 years follow up – Dr. H. Maghaireh & Dr. V. Ivancheva

Wound closure without tension and without having to make extra incisions.

, Delayed implant placement with GBR and soft tissue augmentation at the aesthetic area  -  2 years follow up – Dr. H. Maghaireh & Dr. V. Ivancheva

Wound closure without tension and without having to make extra incisions.

, Delayed implant placement with GBR and soft tissue augmentation at the aesthetic area  -  2 years follow up – Dr. H. Maghaireh & Dr. V. Ivancheva

Healing stage 8 weeks after surgery - healing abutment partly exposed. Sutures were removed 2 weeks after implant and bone graft surgery.

, Delayed implant placement with GBR and soft tissue augmentation at the aesthetic area  -  2 years follow up – Dr. H. Maghaireh & Dr. V. Ivancheva

Healing stage 8 weeks after surgery - healing abutment partly exposed.

, Delayed implant placement with GBR and soft tissue augmentation at the aesthetic area  -  2 years follow up – Dr. H. Maghaireh & Dr. V. Ivancheva

First impression stage for temporary screw retained implant crown 16 weeks after surgery.

, Delayed implant placement with GBR and soft tissue augmentation at the aesthetic area  -  2 years follow up – Dr. H. Maghaireh & Dr. V. Ivancheva

Fit of the temporary screw retained implant bridge 18 weeks after implant placement surgery.

, Delayed implant placement with GBR and soft tissue augmentation at the aesthetic area  -  2 years follow up – Dr. H. Maghaireh & Dr. V. Ivancheva

Gingival zenith and soft tissue contour 5 weeks with the temporary crown.

, Delayed implant placement with GBR and soft tissue augmentation at the aesthetic area  -  2 years follow up – Dr. H. Maghaireh & Dr. V. Ivancheva

Gingival zenith and soft tissue contour 5 weeks with the temporary crown.

, Delayed implant placement with GBR and soft tissue augmentation at the aesthetic area  -  2 years follow up – Dr. H. Maghaireh & Dr. V. Ivancheva

Final result 3 months after surgery and 2 weeks after final prosthetic integration.

, Delayed implant placement with GBR and soft tissue augmentation at the aesthetic area  -  2 years follow up – Dr. H. Maghaireh & Dr. V. Ivancheva

Final result 3 months after surgery and 2 weeks after final prosthetic integration.

, Delayed implant placement with GBR and soft tissue augmentation at the aesthetic area  -  2 years follow up – Dr. H. Maghaireh & Dr. V. Ivancheva

Smile line and harmonisation of white and pink aesthetic.

, Delayed implant placement with GBR and soft tissue augmentation at the aesthetic area  -  2 years follow up – Dr. H. Maghaireh & Dr. V. Ivancheva

Smile line and harmonisation of white and pink aesthetic.

, Delayed implant placement with GBR and soft tissue augmentation at the aesthetic area  -  2 years follow up – Dr. H. Maghaireh & Dr. V. Ivancheva

Two Years follow up